Showing posts with label Jerusalem. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jerusalem. Show all posts

Sunday, March 6, 2016

Don't give up yet





On Tuesday, February 16 the small Pacific island nation of Fiji became the first country in the world to ratify the United Nations climate deal agreed on last December in Paris.  Four days later, Tropical Cyclone Winston, making landfall with sustained winds of 185 miles per hour, slammed into Fiji, leaving tens of thousands homeless and 44 dead, by last count.   It was the strongest storm ever recorded in the southern hemisphere, and on Thursday Joanne Woodland, one of our parishioners who is vacationing in Hawaii, sent me a cell phone video of the massive ocean swell kicked up by the cyclone, pounding the north shore of Oahu.  That swell will get here later in the week, with waves up to thirty feet high forecast to hit the Sonoma Coast on Thursday night.
Unless we have relatives in Fiji, like the folks in the Fijian congregation that meets every Sunday at the Methodist Church over on the next corner do, we might imagine that big waves are the only impact that Cyclone Winston will have in California.  But maybe we feel differently about the eight people shot in Kalamazoo, Michigan on the same day that Winston tore through Fiji.  After all, that incident was in our own country, in a town like this one.  The victims were like us, a young woman watching children play outside the townhome where she lived, a father and son shopping for a car, a teen-aged girl and her grandma, and three other older ladies leaving dinner at the Cracker Barrel restaurant, when a stranger opened fire.
Whatever the case, I think we have a natural tendency to create a mental distance between ourselves and the victims we read about in the news.  It would be hard for us to live if we went around all day waiting for the bullets to start flying, or the wind to knock our houses down.  It is when people are forced to endure conditions like these that they become refugees, and leave behind everything they know and everything they own, to try to find a place to live a semblance of a normal life.  We human beings need to believe that on balance life is good, and the odds are in our favor of living in relative safety and health to a ripe old age. 
So when we hear about terrible events that call these odds into question, we look for explanations, so we can feel like they have causes we can understand, and maybe even control.  Cyclone Winston was so devastating, we say, because climate change is heating up the oceans, creating more powerful storms.  Or Uber drivers in Michigan go on shooting rampages because they are mentally ill, and gun laws are too lax, and media coverage of all these mass shooters is spawning copycats.  In the days before we had sophisticated scientific, historical, and psychological theories of causation, we explained such things in theological terms.  In today’s reading from the Gospel of Luke, Jesus responds to the news of terrible recent events in Jerusalem.  And he asks his listeners if they really believe the popular explanation that the victims of these disasters were being punished by God for their sins. 

What Jesus seems to be saying here is that the distance our explanations create between us and the victims we hear about in the news obscures the truth that they are no different from us.  We may need that distance to insulate us from the fact that our lives are a gift that can be taken away, any day, any moment.  But the disasters that happen to others, says Jesus, are not only an opportunity to give thanks that we have been spared for another day, but to recognize our common predicament.  It’s a chance to really come to terms with how little control we have over what happens in the world, and how little power to keep ourselves safe from harm.  Not so that we will sink into helplessness and fear, but so that we will turn to our only secure refuge, which is the goodness, and forgiveness, and eternal loving-kindness of God.    
To underscore this message, the Gospel of Luke links this saying about disasters in the news with a story about a fig tree that doesn’t bear fruit.  It’s a story that shows up in a slightly different way in Matthew and Mark.  Mark’s version is likely the original, and it begins at Mark 11, verse 12, which, in case you want to look it up.  It comes right after Jesus’ triumphal entry into Jerusalem that we’ll remember in a few weeks on Palm Sunday, at the conclusion of which Jesus goes into the temple and looks around a bit, before returning to his base in Bethany.  On the way back into the city the next day, he’s hungry and looks for fruit on a fig tree.  Finding none, he curses the tree, and says “may no one ever find fruit on you again.”  Jesus then goes to the temple, where he stages a protest, turning over the tables of the money changers, and shouting that they have turned the house of prayer into a robber’s den—you know the story.  The next day he and his disciples pass by the fig tree again, and find it withered to the roots.
By bracketing the story of the so-called cleansing of the temple with the parable of the fig tree, Mark makes a connection between Jesus’ physical hunger for figs and his hunger for God’s righteousness, which is the only hope for his people.  Jesus goes to Jerusalem, not in a bid for political power, but because he is on fire with a prophetic desire.  He longs for the people of Jerusalem, and especially the elite in the temple, to repent--to turn from their cynical, self-satisfied, self-interested ways and return to the ways of God.  But on coming there, Jesus finds no fruit to satisfy this hunger.  There is nothing to work with here, no openness to his message or willingness to act on it.  And this can only mean one thing for Jerusalem—inevitable destruction.

We can go further in understanding the story of the fig tree, if we consider the historical circumstances in which the gospels were written.  The author of Mark was likely writing just about the time of the doomed Jewish revolt against Rome in the year 66.  It was a period of extreme religious and psychological distress for all Jews (and the author of Mark was almost certainly a Jew), as Jerusalem became the focal point, first, of armed insurrection, then of savage civil war, and finally of a brutal Roman campaign of re-conquest.  So it’s not too surprising that the author of Mark wrote in an apocalyptic mood.  He sees Jerusalem’s inevitable fall, and connects it with the things that Jesus said thirty years before: his condemnation of the hypocrisy and corruption of the temple, and his warnings about the final judgment of the world.
But the author of Luke has a different perspective.  For one thing he or she is probably writing a full generation later.  For Luke the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans is a done deal, a past event as distant as the fall of Saigon or the Berlin Wall is for us.  And Luke is interested in what happens next.  For Luke, the death and resurrection of Jesus is not the last faint glimmer of light piercing the darkness at the end of history.  It is the light of dawn, at the beginning of an amazing new story that is already under way.  And Jerusalem’s part in that story does not end with Jesus’ trial and crucifixion.  The city and the temple will stand for another thirty years, and in that time it will be the birthplace of a new community, even a new humanity.  The power of the Holy Spirit will come upon the pioneers of this community in Jerusalem, and from there they will spread news of forgiveness and reconciliation in the life and death and resurrection of Jesus, to Ethiopia and Syria, to Libya, and Asia, and Macedonia, even to Athens and Rome.
So Luke reworks the story of the fig tree, to say that God is not ready to give up on the world just yet, so let’s not give up on each other.  It’s as timely a message now as it ever was, in these days when people seem so ready to harden their hearts against the most desperate and vulnerable people in the world, so ready to blame them for the disaster that has fallen upon them.  When the church is true to Jesus, we are like the gardener he spoke about in Luke’s story of the fig tree, like the gardener he was.  He tells us to roll up our sleeves and go to work.   He tells us not to be afraid to dig around, to loosen the hardened of sin and injustice, and the tangled roots of deceit and delusion and denial.  He tells to be unashamed to scatter the manure of kindness and encouragement, compassion, and helpfulness, and prayer.  He tells us to be patient and watchful and not to lose faith in the power of God, because the old tree in the garden might still bear fruit.  

Sunday, August 31, 2014

Who is welcome?




Last week our Bishop sent me to North Carolina to attend a conference that happens every two years in the Episcopal Church, a gathering of clergy and lay people from all over the country who are engaged in Latino ministry, or who want to be.   A fair number of the participants are first-generation Americans, with limited English, so a lot of the sermons and addresses and workshops, and almost all the songs, were in Spanish.  There was simultaneous translation available, but I chose not to use it.  There were two reasons for this.  The first was that I saw an opportunity to practice my Spanish.  There were some speakers, who, when they really got wound up, left me hopelessly in the dust, and a lot of jokes I didn’t get, but I was pleased with how much I was able to participate in Spanish, and I got better at it as the conference went on.

The second reason why I decided not to use the translation equipment was that I wanted to have an experience that is an everyday reality for many people, but almost never happens to me.  What with my sex, and the color of my eyes and skin, and my native language, socio-economic status, and level of education, and my degree of physical and mental ability, I have the privilege of access almost everywhere I go.  I feel like I belong.  And that is nowhere more true than in the church.  “The Episcopal Church Welcomes You” is a slogan that I know, without question, applies to me.  But sitting in the auditorium at that conference, where I was in the minority ethnic group, trying to sing a song I didn’t know, or get the gist of a speech in a language I didn’t completely understand, gave me just a little taste of what it is like to be a cultural outsider, an “other.”  

At the celebration of the Holy Eucharist on Wednesday afternoon I somehow ended up in the front row of the auditorium.  After the sermon it was announced that there would be laying on of hands and prayer for those with particular needs or concerns.  And sure enough, eight or so of the Latino and Latina priests in albs and stoles took positions up on the stage or in the space right in front of the first row of seats, and the people started lining up.  My immediate thought was that I didn’t have anything going on in my life that was serious enough to require special prayer.  I thought of the other people in that audience, and I imagined what they must deal with in terms of poverty, or separation from their families, doubtful immigration status, or serious disease, and I thought that they surely needed prayer more than I did. 

So I decided to sit and pray quietly to myself.  And I prayed for peace in the places in the world where there are wars and political turmoil.  And I prayed for people in this congregation and others that I know who are suffering or struggling in different ways.  But I also had a front row seat for the action that was going on around me, and my eyes kept straying upward to watch the people with their heads bowed, and the priests holding them in their hands and leaning in with their eyes closed, whispering their prayers, and I saw the hugs that sometimes followed after the prayers were said, and the tears.  After a few minutes I noticed that that, if there was some kind of expectation that you had to have really serious problems in order to go up for a prayer, people were either ignoring that requirement or else this was a group that was really hurting because the lines down the middle of the auditorium and in the side aisles were getting longer, not shorter.

 Well, I began to wonder whether maybe I should reconsider my decision not to join them, but I also started to worry about the time.  This Eucharist was supposed to end at 4:15 and I’d made plans to go for a run and a swim in the lake before dinner at 6:00 and some of these priests were really taking a long time with their prayers, and if I got into line, then everybody might as well do it and we’d never get out of there on time.  So I straightened up in my seat and closed my eyes and returned to my private prayer, and after a while I began to pray for members of my own family, for my crazy old uncle living by himself way up on the North Coast, and another uncle with cancer, and then I thought of my brother.  I started to pray for my brother who has a drug problem, and is unemployed, and has never really done much with his exceptional talents, but is just kind of stuck in a perpetual adolescence, and of all the shame and self-hatred I know he carries, and the sorrow and worry it causes my parents and I started to feel really, really sad, and I recognized that I did have something I needed prayer for.

But by then there were just a few people left in line, and the others had gone back to their seats, and the priests had started to turn and lay hands on each other, and I wasn’t sure which one to go to, and I didn’t want to be stupid and rude, like “hey, I know we’re almost finished, but I changed my mind.”  And I wasn’t sure that I wouldn’t start crying if I started talking to a priest  about my brother right then, and then I would have to walk back to my seat with everybody in the auditorium watching me.  And the thing was, that room was filled with a spirit of kindness and compassion in that moment and I’m sure that whatever I did no one was going to judge me, and it would have been okay. 

But I never did go up for a prayer, because I was afraid to be vulnerable.  I was so attached to the idea of being better off than those people that I couldn’t see my own need for healing, or that those “others” were offering it to me.  “The Episcopal Church Welcomes You,” is a slogan I can get behind as long as I’m the one doing the welcoming; but let me be the stranger in need of welcome, and I hesitate and am afraid, standing outside wondering if it’s safe to go in.

In today’s gospel reading Peter and Jesus have a fight, because Peter thinks that whatever it means that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, it doesn’t involve being vulnerable.  But Jesus sees it differently.  He knows that the world that human beings have made is one where people quite easily and almost without thinking assume that some were meant to rule and others to be ruled, some to possess and other to be dispossessed, some to enjoy the blessings of prosperity and peace, and others to live and die in misery and violence, as if all of this were quite natural, even willed by God.  But Jesus sees God taking a place in this world with the poor, with those who mourn, those who hunger and thirst for justice, who suffer persecution for the cause of peace and for the truth.  So the Messiah will make the journey the holy city of Jerusalem as a vulnerable stranger, an outsider, one whose right to be there is in doubt, whose fate is in his enemies’ hands.

It wasn’t hard to predict what would happen to him there.  He would suffer and be killed, as prophets and martyrs have suffered and been killed again and again before Jesus and ever since.  What happened was business as usual, entirely ordinary except for one thing—on the third day Jesus rose from the dead, and his disciples were witnesses of it.  And that one thing is what makes all the difference.  It is what makes the cross not a place where God’s voice in the world is silenced once again, but where God’s truth speaks most clearly.  It is where we see the world as God sees it—where God dispels the illusions of human privilege and power, and drags hypocritical religion and rationalized barbarity out of the shadows.  The cross is where God lights up the whole of human life, even at its most treacherous and cruel, its most abused and degraded, with the eternal glory of the Son of Man—his compassion, his forgiveness, his wisdom and love. 

The cross is where we learn to follow Christ on a journey of healing and being healed, welcoming and being welcomed, that reaches across every barrier of culture, class, language, sex and sexual orientation, race and religion, to touch God in the hand of the other, and where we learn to say “ hermano”, “hermana”-- “brother”, “sister”.
  

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

Child's Play



The Liturgy of the Palms
The Liturgy of the Word

My daughter Risa is nearing the end of fourth grade, and this year she’s been getting homework assigned every week at school.   She’s also started taking a bigger share of caring for herself, making her own snacks, cleaning her own room.  A couple of weeks ago we adopted a kitten, at her urging, and the deal that my wife and I made with her was that it would be, officially, her pet, and she could pick out the one she wanted, and give it the name she chose, but in return, she would have to get the kitty food and water, and clean her litter box. 
And with these changes in Risa’s life our relationship with her is changing.  It used to mostly be about doing things together, but now it’s more and more about helping her do things by herself.  There’s a way in which this is a healthy, age-appropriate development, but there are also times when I feel like I’m the unwitting agent of a soulless world.  And as I function more and more as Risa’s taskmaster, helping her get there on schedule, and complete it on time, and get it done right, I am subtly reinforcing the message that these are the things that matter, and we seem to have few and fewer opportunities to play.  
Risa still regularly invites me to play.  Sometimes I accept, and we’ll wrestle, or make up a song or a story, or a silly game with rules we invent as we go along.  But as often as not I’ll say there’s still some work to do, or it’s too close to bedtime, or I’m just too tired.  There are certainly times when one or more of these things are true.  But there are also times when I’m just stuck.  I’m so used to being the grown-up who is always in charge of the situation, so identified with being the responsible parent, so focused keeping us on track toward the goal, that I get stuck in that role.  And to get unstuck, to come down from there into the intimate give-and-take, the open-ended, timeless place of play is a step I’m unwilling or even afraid to take.
    
When I think of the scene of Jesus riding into Jerusalem, I imagine that the crowd that was shouting and running along, waving palm branches, included a lot of children.  Actually, I know there were children there, because if you read on, the very next section of Matthew’s Gospel tells how Jesus went into the temple, and started driving out the money-changers and overturning the seats of those who sold doves for the sacrifices, and people came to him and he healed them.  And it says that the children were crying out in the temple, “Hosanna to the Son of David!”  The Chief Priests and the scribes came up to Jesus and said, “Do you not hear what these children are saying?” 
To these guys, shouting “Hosanna to the Son of David” in the temple is not child’s play.  It is like joking about having a bomb in your bag at the airport.  Because right next to the temple, looming over its courtyard like a hammer poised to fall, is the fortress of the Roman Governor.  Don’t say you’re the new David, the Messiah, the true King of Israel, unless you mean it, because if you’re serious, it means war.
But they were wrong about what Jesus had come there to do.  You’ll remember that at one point, when his disciples asked him who was top dog, he took a little child and put it in the middle of them and said, “Unless you change and become like this little child, you will never enter the Kingdom of Heaven.”  The children of Jerusalem may not have understood exactly what Jesus was doing that day, but they were much closer to the mark than the leaders in the temple.  Those men assumed that he was trying to outplay them at their own game, and so they secretly set their traps for him.  But the children saw that Jesus was inviting them to his game, which was entirely different, a game that was creative, and joyful, and fun, that welcomed everyone who wanted to participate, and had no winner and no losers.  It was open-ended, a game that could potentially go on forever, and there was a place in it for them, so they came out to play.
The elders, and Chief priests, and scribes of Jerusalem got it wrong about what Jesus had come there to do.  And ever since the church has been saying we’ve got it right.  Over the centuries, our great preachers and theologians have come up with all kinds of explanations for what Jesus went there to do.  Most of them sound very serious and businesslike.  They talk about the atoning work of Christ, and what he accomplished on the cross, and his death as a transaction by which he substituted his own sinless life for the lives of us sinners, and took on himself the punishment that by all rights should have fallen on us.  Mostly they seem to agree that Jesus went to Jerusalem in order to die.
But while the theologians give their explanations there is a kind of childlike wisdom in the liturgical tradition of the church, that is faithful to the outlook of the first Christian generations who gave us the gospels, who understood that an explanation isn’t half as good as a story.  And this popular liturgical tradition knows that even a story isn’t as good as a play.  There is an intuitive understanding, that you see expressed in different ways all over the world, in German Passion Plays, and Guatemalan Holy Week processions, and even here in St. John’s, Petaluma, that the passion of Jesus is a drama.  I think this is no accident, but conveys a deep insight into the mind of Christ, and even the purposes of God.
Because Jesus didn’t go into Jerusalem to take over and become king, and maybe he didn’t even go there to die on the cross for our sins.  Maybe he didn’t have a particular goal in mind at all, except to be faithful to the role that God had given him.  Maybe he was simply continuing a game he’d been playing all along, acting as if God really loves us, and really rules the world, and really just wants us all to come out and play, in the open air, in the light, of truth, of forgiveness, and compassion, and thanksgiving, and peace, and Jesus was willing even at the risk of his own life, to bring God’s invitation to the priests, and the elders, and the scribes.  Of course he was no fool, so he guessed how they would react.  We watch them play out their own roles, and every scene that follows has its grim theatricality—Judas’ kiss in the garden, the kangaroo court in the High Priest’s house, Pilate’s washing his hands in front of the crowd, the soldier’s brutal parody of coronation, and the naked tortured body on the gibbet by the city gate, with the placard reading “King of the Jews.”
These actors think they know what they’re doing.  They think they are making a grand show of power, and innocence, and possession of the sacred public trust.  Little do they know that down through the ages they will be synonymous with treachery, impiety, and murder.  How could they know that they are tearing away forever the false pretensions of dominating power, exposing the death’s head behind the mask?  They think that they are making an example of Jesus, a sign of terror and humiliation to his followers and all the people.  How could they know that they are exalting him forever as savior and redeemer and Lord?  Who is the overlooked, forgotten actor in the drama who could bring this about?  What shocking, unexpected twist could make such a dramatic reversal?  Tune in next week to find out.
         
  

About Me

My photo
Petaluma, California, United States
I am a priest in the Episcopal Church, and have been (among other things) an organic farmer and gardener, and a Zen monk. I have a lifelong interest in social and spiritual renewal on the basis of contemplative discipline, creative nonviolence, and ecological practice. In recent years my work has focused intensely on the responsibility of pastoral ministry in the humanistic, evangelical, and catholic branch of Christianity known as Anglicanism. I'm married with a daughter, and have three brothers and two parents.