Showing posts with label wedding feast. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wedding feast. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 5, 2014

Happy to be here




I was on the phone last week with an old friend talking about the possibility of being called as the next Rector of St. John’s, Petaluma, and he said I am in the very privileged position of being a second “Founding Father” of the parish.  “Founding Father”—I liked the sound of that, but I also immediately thought about all of you.  The project of renewing this congregation is only in its eighth year, and still has a long way to go, so all of us here today, even those who are newly arrived, can consider ourselves part of the founding generation.  I also thought about how many of our Founding Fathers are Mothers.  I read an interview recently with Philip Jenkins, the leading academic on global  Christianity.  Asked about the role of women in the church in Africa, where, barring an unimaginable catastrophe, there will be a billion Christians by 2050, he said “Even if they are not ordained, women are key among the lay leaders.  Women bring their menfolk in as converts.  If a church doesn’t have a very strong female base and constituency, it is going nowhere.”

The same is true here, of course, and I saw a beautiful illustration of this a week ago yesterday.  I officiated at the marriage of one of our members at her home outside of Santa Rosa, and many of the wedding guests were from St. John’s.  Theresa Peter was the DJ for the event, and after dinner she cranked up the dance tunes.  Jason Klein and I were sitting at a table on the patio outside and we looked up and saw that eight or ten of the Founding Mothers of our church had formed a circle and were dancing together on the other side of the pool.  Now I’m not going to name names, but I can tell you that the church ladies were getting down, and taking turns strutting their stuff into the center of the ring.  And to me that was a vision of what I love about the spirit of the Episcopal Church, and why we have gone to such an effort to keep it alive here in Petaluma.

Because while we prize our formal liturgical worship, and we commit ourselves in baptism to live disciplined lives of prayer and service, and although we value hard work, and intellectual rigor, and the patient endurance of suffering as much as anyone, and while we do not underestimate the gravity of sin and the destructiveness of its consequences, or our great need for forgiveness and the unmerited gift of Christ’s righteousness, we also affirm the basic goodness of life.  We find a lot to celebrate in the common things of the created world, and those ordinary human experiences of love and pleasure, of beauty and belonging, that speak to us of God.  Another one of our members summed it up for me very simply at that same wedding reception last weekend when he said to me, “we really are meant to be happy, aren’t we?”

I think this experience of simply being happy, of being among friends and enjoying life, was central to the mission of Jesus.  When he heard about the murder of John the Baptist he decided to get out of town and lay low for a while, but there were a lot of people, a huge crowd, in fact, who went after him.  They were desperate for some relief of the suffering and hopelessness of their lives and they saw him take off in his boat and followed, walking along the edge of the lake until he came ashore.  When he landed they were waiting for him, and he felt compassion for their misery; so he healed the ones who were sick, and next thing you know it was suppertime.  

His disciples wanted to send the crowd away, but Jesus decided instead to have a picnic.  Everyone sat down together on the grass, and ate their fill of bread and fish, looking out over the lake as the sun was going down.  The young men and women flirted with each other.  The air was full of the laughter of children at play.  No one had to pay, or to cook or clean up.  And Jesus didn’t make a speech to that crowd.  He didn’t announce a new liberation movement to solve all their problems.  He didn’t hold a religious revival meeting for the salvation of their souls.  But for a couple of hours that evening, Jesus helped everyone remember what it was like to be happy.

You wouldn’t think this was such a controversial thing to have done.  But the fact is that one of things that Jesus’ enemies found so threatening about him was that he made people happy.  They were happy around in a way they hadn’t been in a long, long time, and he seemed to enjoy them, too.  “This fellow is a glutton and a drunkard,” grumbled the other religious leaders, “who welcomes tax collectors and sinners and eats with them.”  And these critics were actually pretty astute, because they recognized that nothing is as revolutionary as happiness.  When people experience it, they quite naturally understand that this is their birthright.  They remember how simple it really is, and that it shouldn’t be too much to ask. 

This leads them to some really uncomfortable questions about themselves, but also about the rules and rationales that dominate their lives.  They wonder why they spend so much time and energy struggling to stave off disaster, or avoid punishment, or compensate for their obligatory shame and unworthiness, and so little doing things that make them truly happy.  They question the dogma that happiness is only for the fortunate few, and ask whether anyone really can be happy when the person across the street, across town, or across the border is in misery.  And just as Jesus was not shy about sharing his happiness, he was also willing to raise the questions it provoked, and to press them as far as they took him, which, as we know, ended up being the cross. 

As founding Mothers and Fathers of the new and continuing St. John’s Episcopal Church, we’ve been trying to articulate something about why we’re here.  More and more people are making do without any religion at all, and for those who do need it, there is no shortage of trendy and user-friendly options.  So why go to all the trouble of renewing and rebuilding this parish, when the tides of cultural change seem to be flowing in the other direction?  To answer that question we’ve had Vestry Retreats, and come up with a mission statement, and held Vision Conversations, and Discernment Conversations, and done a lot of speaking and listening by way of trying to say something clear, and compelling, and true. 

And we have been very careful to frame these conversations so it is clear that we are not being selfish, but that we are all about what God is calling us to do, and how we can serve Christ, and love our neighbor.  And maybe we really mean that in all sincerity, yet I also suspect that there is at least a little part of us that believes that this is what we’re supposed to say.  But true spiritual discernment is about letting go of what we think is supposed to be and becoming open to what is, as we see in the living light of the Spirit.  So today I’m saying there may be no shame in admitting that we come to church because it makes us happy, or because we still hope to be, or want to remember what it was like, and because we know that happiness multiplies and deepens when it is shared.  

In a world grown deeply cynical about human beings, that reduces happiness to power and possessions, to entertainment and aggression and sex, we hold on to the happiness of Jesus.  It was the cause he suffered and died for, and that should be enough to tell us that it is not something sentimental or superficial.  It is what he was raised again for, so that his revolutionary happiness would not die, but would be universal and eternal.  We come to church because we insist on believing his promise of being happy, and to listen to his teaching about how to hope and to work, to give and to love, to suffer and to pray, for a truly happy world.

Wednesday, May 21, 2014

God is ready



This sermon was given at the wedding of Mack Olson and Jeremy Karagan at St. John's, Petaluma on May 17th, 2014.  Mack was raised up for ordination to the priesthood at St. John's, as is presently serving as Rector of the Episcopal Church of the Epiphany in Vacaville, California.  Jeremy is an ornamental horticulturist.  
You can read the Santa Rosa Press-Democrat's coverage of Mack's ordination service here.   

Ruth 1:16-17
1 John 4:7-16, 21
Psalm 111  
John 2:1-11

Mack and Jeremy met with me several times over the last few months for the counseling that the church requires of a couple that’s going to be married.  And one of the things that came up in the course of our conversations was the question of readiness.  This, I have to say, is not so unusual.  People often have doubts about whether they are ready to be married, before and after their wedding day.  I’m going to guess that many of us here have felt like that at one time or another.

But I had good news for Jeremy and Mack, which was that no one is ever ready.   You can’t get ready to be married, because being married is one of those things you can only learn to do by doing it.   In one sense all we are doing here today is witnessing and celebrating what everyone already knows, that Jeremy and Mack are married.  But you could also just as truthfully say that we have come to offer our support and to bless them, because here they take the first step of a long journey, the journey of becoming truly married, which only begins today.

So, Mack, Jeremy, no, you’re not ready, but that doesn’t matter.  Because marriage is ready for you, and all you have to do now is take each other by the hand and walk through the door.  It’s not any different from what Jesus found out at the wedding in Cana of Galilee.  He wasn’t ready—“My hour is not come,” he said.  But his mother knew better (way to go, Mom!).  He wasn’t ready to come out and reveal himself to his disciples and to the world, but everything was ready for him.  The world was ready for its bridegroom, and Jesus didn’t know it, and the world didn’t know it, but God did.  And so that is where it started—the water of purification and preparation was transformed into the wine of fulfillment.. 

And here we are 1,980-odd years later and the transformation is still ongoing.  But the world still insists it’s not ready—“we’re still not pure enough,” we say, “we’re still not good enough to be united in a covenant of love with God.”  “We can tolerate gay people, but we’re not ready for gay priests.  We can accept that they form lifelong committed relationships, but we’re not ready for same-sex marriage.  We’re not ready—we need more study, more dialogue, more preparation.”  But the mother of Jesus just shrugs, and turns to the servants, to the General Convention of The Episcopal Church, and the Supreme Court of the United States, and the Attorney General of the State of California, and says, “do whatever He tells you.”  And next thing you know, Mack and Jeremy are walking into Camp Noel Porter and there’s Bishop Beisner and he looks at them and they look at him, and they know—not a word even needs to be said.

It must still a little hard for you to believe, Jeremy and Mack, just how quickly something that had been ruled off-limits for you forever became a matter of obedience.  But that’s what a miracle looks like.  That’s the way things happen when God is ready.  And that’s why I had to smile a little bit inside when we met the other day and you were talking about how much has happened over the last couple of years, with Mack’s ordination, and the call to Vacaville, and Jeremy being out of work, and now this, and how you’re looking forward to just kind of letting things be settled and stable for a while.  It could happen, don’t get me wrong, and maybe it will—if God is ready for that, but I wouldn’t count on it.

I suppose there are marriages that are entirely human affairs, which are made solely for the satisfaction of the couple, for their contentment, and comfort, and ease.  But now you’ve gone and come to the church, and asked for yours to be blessed as a Christian marriage, which means that it doesn’t completely belong to the two of you.  It is for you, but as part of something much greater, the ministry of Christ, reconciling all creation to itself and to God.  This is true for you, in a particular way, because one of you is a priest, but it is equally true, in a different way, because one of you is a layman.
    
Even the simplest civil marriage has public aspect.  You have to go in person to a county building to obtain a license issued by the state, entitling you to rights that will be recognized by public institutions like banks, and hospitals, and courts of law.  And even a private ceremony requires an officiant and a witness.  But now you are having this big ceremony where lots of people, representing various aspects of your lives, who don’t know each other very well, have come together and here, with all of us watching, you will make a public declaration of your most tender, intimate hopes and intentions.  In just a moment, all eyes will be on you, as you make your vows.  And before those eyes something hidden will be made manifest. Something invisible will become visible.  Your invisible love for each other will be made visible for all to see. 

But, as we have heard, love is not just love—love is from God and God is love.   And we have a special name in the church for something that makes God visible, not as a private inner mystical experience, but right out there where everyone can see, and hear, and touch, and taste it, and that word is “sacrament.”  Today your love for each other becomes a sacrament, communicating to the world the presence of God.    It is a real presence, and because you have generously invited us to be here, and have mustered up the courage to stand before us, to take each other’s hands and speak your vows, we have the privilege of sharing that presence with you.  You give us a taste of the good wine, the wine of fulfillment and celebration and communion, the vintage of Christ that God pours out in extravagant abundance when the inferior wine is gone.

In this marriage rite we all see a sign of the God of love who gives life to the whole world.  But this sign is embodied in your particular, mutual choosing of just this one person.  It is your covenant with each other, and each other alone, Mack choosing Jeremy, Jeremy choosing Mack, that fills this moment with sacramental power.  And that choice must be made, that covenant renewed, again and again for a lifetime, if the sacrament is to fulfill its promise.   We can support you, and pray for you-- we have just made our vow to do that--but the real holy work, and the grace to do it, is for you, together, alone.  Marriage is priestly work, whether you’re ordained or not, accomplished in daily acts of sacrifice, of listening and noticing and telling the truth, of service and nurture, play and affection, of offering forgiveness and making amends, of standing firm and breaking down, of needing and responding, and coming close, and leaving alone.  

Marriage is a human life, a lifetime, offered to God in that most human of hopes, the hope of loving and being loved.  And when it is done faithfully and well, it fulfills God’s fondest hope for us—that we know love, love that is stronger than fear, stronger than anger, stronger than greed, and impatience, ambition, boredom, fatigue, distraction, self-pity, confusion, sorrow, and resentment.  God’s hope for the whole world is that in steadfastly loving each other, even in the face of death, God’s own love will be perfected in you.


Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Going to the wedding feast



In its essence this parable of the great feast is a likeable story, with the wry, subversive message of so many of Jesus’ parables.  If we associate ourselves with the random and gratuitous guests who make it into the feast in the end, we feel quite nice about it.   Or we would, if it weren’t for all the violence.   Luke’s Gospel gives us the same story, only it’s not a king and there’s no wedding and no son.  But there’s also no murdering or destroying or burning, or binding hand and foot, or weeping and gnashing of teeth.  So what is Matthew up to?   
One way of understanding the bloody mess that Matthew makes of this  parable is as a struggle to understand  how the coming of Jesus, which was meant to be the renewal and fulfillment of God’s saving acts in history through his people Israel, was met not just with indifference,  but with violence.  The community out of which this Gospel emerged likely had first-hand experience of that violence, which began with the murder of Jesus but did not end there.   It did not end with the Jewish War of rebellion that came later, or when the armies of Rome recaptured Jerusalem, massacred the population, and burned the city to the ground, an event to which this text probably refers.  The violence did not end when some Jews were forcibly expelled from the synagogue for their insistence on acclaiming Jesus as Messiah.   And it did not end when the church moved from the persecuted margins to the center of power and began to use texts like this one to justify wave upon wave   of violence against Jews. 
It still goes on, the needless, absurd violence of history, when God’s only desire is to call us together into the wedding feast of his Son.  And that, in some sense, is why we are here today.  We come at God’s invitation to remember and to celebrate the promise that there is a meaning and purpose to human history deeper than the clash of religions and empires.    In Christ we find that deep purpose of God, and when we come to his table we experience just a taste of his wedding feast, where all divisions and disagreements are forgotten and we are reconciled with God and one another in the abundance of mercy and love.   
Sound nice, doesn’t it?   So why, then, does Matthew have to go and spoil everything?  Why, when we’d begun to relax and feel like the tension in the story is resolved, does he have to ratchet it back up again by putting in this bit about the man who got thrown out of the party for wearing the wrong clothes?
To answer that we have to understand another use of the rhetoric of violence in Matthew’s Gospel.   You can actually see the same thing in lots of places in the Bible—like in the story of the golden calf that we also heard this morning.  In these cases, this language is not a reference to literal, historic violence, but is meant to convey the power of emotion.   It is a way of speaking of the intensity, and vulnerability, of God’s love.   Anger, jealousy, vengeance are metaphorical ways of saying that here is a place where, if we’re not careful, we are liable to betray God’s trust.  But it’s also a point about which God is not indifferent, not lukewarm, or just kind of interested.  
Modern bible critics, especially feminist ones, have questioned the implied equation between love and violence in this kind of theological metaphor, but that’s a topic for another day.   What I’m suggesting now is that this little episode of the man without the wedding  garment is Matthew’s way of saying that God’s promise, what’s really going on in history, what we really  should be orienting our lives toward, in  spite of  all the ambient craziness,  is a wedding feast— and this  promise really matters  to God.   We shouldn’t think that just because we were invited to the feast graciously and at random, we can just slide in for the free food and beer.   It’s the king’s son we’re talking about here, and we need to show up with our best.
My cousin Joui, the San Francisco fashion  designer,  who got married in August,  sent out  wedding invitations that included instructions on what to wear.  It was kind of a head-scratcher—as I recall there was something about “think  Great Gatsby meets Bollywood”—but  as near as  any of us could figure out what she was really  trying to say was  “be creative.”   Don’t just reach into the closet and  pull  out that suit you keep there for weddings and funerals.  Have some fun.  Make me happy and show up with some flair.  Well, we stodgy older relatives kind of grumbled about it and rolled our eyes, but then we set to work on our costume because we knew it was important to her.  And we did end up looking quite colorful, I must say.  My eighty-year old dad took the prize by showing up at his niece’s wedding in drag.  When we asked him why, he said that he went  to the thrift store  to try to find suitable attire,  but nothing on the men’s rack fit the bill, while there was lots of glamorous ladies’ clothing just his size.
Today we kick off our annual  pledge  season at St. John’s.  It’s a time when we celebrate the generosity of God in calling us all together into the banquet.   We’re marking the occasion with a kind of party in the Parish Hall where we show off for one another about all the good work we’re doing and all the fun we’re having doing it.    Over the course of the next four  weeks  we’ll  be  hearing from representatives of our congregation  about what a difference it makes in  their  lives  to respond generously to God’s invitation—to come to the wedding dressed to the nines.   And we’ll have inserts in the bulletin each week that invite us to share in a reflection on the themes of abundance,  gratitude, and generosity that is taking place across the Episcopal Church.
Those of  us who  planned this stewardship program want it to be a low-key and enjoyable affair.   Whatever form your participation takes will be welcome, even if it comes off the ladies’ rack.   But  as  much as we insist that  giving  to the church is good for our health (which it is), and that St. John’s is worthy of our support (which it  is),  and as careful as we are to  keep the tone upbeat and encouraging and positive (which  we should) there is still that little bit of  tension  that  inevitably  comes along with  pledge season.    At  least  there  is  for  me.   When  I look  into it and try to understand  what that tension  is  about, I find  that Matthew’s Gospel,  that reliable guide to what is simultaneously so sublime and so challenging about  the Christian life, has an answer.  
The first explanation for that inevitable tension is that we can’t accept the invitation  to the wedding feast without also thinking  about all  the  things  going on in the  world  that make us afraid and hinder our generosity.   We  can’t help it—we think about the  wars and the economy and gas prices and how will I educate  my kids and what about my retirement, and will the crops fail and what happens when the fish are all fished out of the sea?   When we commit ourselves to give such and such an amount of our money and our time to St. John’s in the coming year, we have to push through all those anxieties and say, “God—I’m coming to your feast, because that’s the world that I believe in.”  That’s not easy, it takes faith, and hope, and love, but it goes to very  heart of what it means to follow Christ.
And the second reason why there’s always just a little tension around this pledging thing is that we can’t escape the nagging suspicion that it matters to God.   There’s this little voice deep down, when I get my pledge statement and see how much I’ve given (or how little), or when I’m relaxing at the end of a long week of hard work, that says, “was that your best?   Is that your wedding garment?”   It’s not about being guilty, or feeling inadequate, or fearing God’s wrath.  It’s not even about how much I love St. John’s Church, and want it to succeed.   It’s about knowing how much God loves St. John’s Church.   It’s about how deeply God yearns for us, here, to live in the kingdom.  It’s about feeling in my heart how passionately God wants to use us to invite anyone who will come to the wedding feast of Christ the Son.       

About Me

My photo
Petaluma, California, United States
I am a priest in the Episcopal Church, and have been (among other things) an organic farmer and gardener, and a Zen monk. I have a lifelong interest in social and spiritual renewal on the basis of contemplative discipline, creative nonviolence, and ecological practice. In recent years my work has focused intensely on the responsibility of pastoral ministry in the humanistic, evangelical, and catholic branch of Christianity known as Anglicanism. I'm married with a daughter, and have three brothers and two parents.