Showing posts with label United Nations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United Nations. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

Playing with fire




On the day of Pentecost, says the book of Acts, the disciples of Jesus “were all together in one place.”  And that “together” is a prelude to what happens next.  Because the sudden sound of a howling wind from heaven brings people running to them from every direction.  They come rushing together into that same place, and when they get there we see that a kind of United Nations has spontaneously broken out.  And just like at the United Nations, where the delegates put on their headphones and listen to the simultaneous interpreters in the back room, these people all hear the same speech, but each of them hears it in his or her own native tongue.  

But you notice that as soon as the extraordinary experience is over, they all turn to each other and start conversing normally about what has happened.  And then Peter stands up, and addresses all of them together at once, and quotes at length from the Bible.  He can do this because they all know the Bible in the same translation, and they share a single language that all of them can understand.  It is the common language of business and government, of science, philosophy, and literature, of magic and religion.  It is called Greek.   

Greek was the language of a unity enforced from above, imposed on the peoples of the Eastern Mediterranean by a conquering empire.  But in the flaming tongues of the Holy Spirit, these pilgrims and residents of Jerusalem experience a new possibility—a unity of the heart.  The “all together in one place” of the Jesus community opens up and invites them to enter a new world.  And this invitation comes to each of them, individually, in a way that reminds them of home.

I once had a girlfriend from Germany.  More precisely, she was from East Germany, and she had come to Berkeley to study theology a couple of years after the wall came down.   We met during the final year of her graduate fellowship, and when it was over she decided to return home.  She had already determined that she would not go on to get her doctorate.  And she was an only child, estranged from her parents, so I asked her why on earth she would want to go back to the grimy, depressed, post-Stalinist world she had grown up in when she could remain in California with me.  And she told me how homesick she was for the German language.  As a theologian and lover of poetry, her true home was not a place, but the sounds and the meanings of her mother tongue.  

This first part of the Pentecost story appeals to us today.  “Diversity” is a positive watchword of our culture, and the “spirituality” that is not “religious” believes that languages as diverse as psychology, physics, and the world’s varied sacred traditions all say essentially the same thing.  But while it is the new orthodoxy that we must tolerate each other’s differences, and there are no differences that really matter, real unity seems far beyond our grasp. 

Even on Pentecost Day, there were those in the crowd who were cynical and scornful of what they had seen and heard.  That’s when Peter stands and refers the crowd back to their common story.  He quotes to them from memory their sacred scriptures, in the Greek translation they all know.  And he says that the ancient promise of God is coming true, the promise of the pouring out of God’s Spirit, making prophets of everyone, young and old, men and women, even slaves.  And again we hear this and it makes us feel good, because it seems very egalitarian and progressive, just the kind of collective spiritual experience we would want to have. 
 
But Peter keeps going with his quotation from scripture.  Because in this prophecy the Spirit that is promised to all people is not an isolated thing; it is but one part of a greater fulfillment—the coming of the great and glorious day of the Lord.   “What you have just experienced,” says Peter to the crowd, “is a sign of the times, a harbinger of the climax of God’s saving acts in history, and the promised judgment of the world.”  If only Peter had stopped a verse or too sooner, because this is a promise that sounds to us like more of a threat, the kind of thing that makes “spiritual but not religious” people shudder, and religious people, well, embarrassed.  

But that is because we imagine that God’s judgment is like ours.  We like to think we are tolerant, but we have judged the world and found it guilty, so we assume that God will do the same.   We judge the world and find it guilty, when we see the needless suffering of the innocent and the folly of the mighty and shrug our shoulders and say, “what can you do?”  We judge it guilty when we accept our own simplistic explanations for the actions of our enemies, and refuse to consider that they might have reasons for the things they do and say.  We judge the world and condemn it when we have no hope for its future, and pray to escape to some other, better, one in the great beyond.  

But I think that deep down in many of us, maybe all of us, is the longing for resolution, the hope for real unity.  We live in a world of conflicts—over power and money, and market-share, over water, and land, and minerals; conflicts over the interpretation of law and memory and sacred text; over borders, and who belongs on which side of them; over who is the bigger victim, and who got more love from Mom, and who’s to blame when something goes wrong.  But in this welter of conflicted nations, and sexes, and religions, of conflicted persons, with conflicted thoughts and conflicted feelings, there are some who still hope for authoritative judgment to decide what is right for everyone, and what needs to be done.

The Holy Spirit is the power of that judgment, already at work in the world.  For Peter and the disciples, it is the Spirit that was in Jesus, and according to the Gospel of John, he gave it to them on Easter night.   They are in their little upper room, hiding from the world in fear, and he comes to them, and to their conflicted hearts his word is “peace.”  In that peace sends them, as he was sent, not to condemn the world, but that it might be saved.  And so they can carry on his messianic work, Jesus breathes the Holy Spirit on them, giving them the power of judgment.  "Receive the Holy Spirit,” he says, “If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained."

We Christians have tended to treat forgiveness as if it were a law to be obeyed.  But to forgive without making a judgment is to refuse the gift of the Holy Spirit.  It is to scorn the mighty act of God that Pentecost reveals in tongues of many lands—that in Christ God entrusts the loving judgment of the world to human hands.   The kind of forgiveness that flows from the wounds of Christ is not a magic wand that we wave over situations of injustice, of cruelty and pain, and say “all is forgotten.”  It is forgiveness founded on the power of the Spirit to move hearts of stone to repentance.  It is about the restoration of broken relationships and the healing of the soul.

The judgment of the world is worship in Spirit and in Truth, and this requires that some sins be retained.  Not so that they can be punished—that is exactly the kind of self-righteous hypocrisy Jesus condemned so fiercely—but so that they can be forgiven.  Because without the acknowledgment that sin has been committed, and harm has been done, forgiveness never comes.  We remember the things that were done and we remember that they are sins, because this is the judgment that saves the world. 

This judgment is a grave responsibility, that falls on us as we bring it to bear on others, and if you don’t feel a sense of awe in the face of this power, I fear for you.  To accept it is to play with fire.  It can get you killed, and it can turn you into a monster.  To use it wisely requires tremendous humility, and patience, and total surrender to the wisdom of God.  But it is in this judgment that that we will come at last to the unity that all people, from every land, have sought for a thousand generations, the unity of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit.    

Friday, November 22, 2013

God's dream of peace




The prophecies in the second half of the Book of Isaiah came to an exile in Babylon.  He or she spoke to other Jews in exile, whose condition was a constant reminder of the horrors of war and starvation, of the destruction of Jerusalem and the bitter shame of captivity and deportation.  To these people their historical situation was not simply the result of failed policy.  It was not merely a national defeat.  It was a divine judgment.  The memory of horror, and the pang of loss, and the burden of oppression were constant reminders to these people of their collective sins.  They had squandered the blessings of God’s covenant with them; they had betrayed God with idolatrous worship, and injustice to each other, and violence toward their neighbors.

But the word of God to them, through the prophet, is that the memory of guilt will not decide their future —“the former things shall not be remembered or come to mind,” says God,  “for I am about to create new heavens and a new earth.”  In spite of their hopeless situation, God’s dream for them is not over.  If anything, it is coming more clearly into view.  God’s dream is of Jerusalem as a place of peace and safety and justice.  It is a vision of a community living life to the full, without fear or sorrow or want. 

These words must have seemed remote from the everyday experience of the people.  But that is what makes them like a sudden dawn breaking what felt like an endless night.  The vision of the prophet was like a dream, but it was a dream that awakened them from the slumber of numbness and despair.  It rang with a truth that ran counter to everything that they could have reasonably assumed from a practical assessment of their real life situation.  The vision of the new creation was a dream that could only have come from God.

Today’s reading from the Gospel of Luke speaks to the turmoil of the second half of the first century.  It was the time of the Jews’ bloody revolt against Roman rule, of the Romans’ savage campaign of re-conquest and their destruction of Jerusalem and the second temple; it was the time of the first waves of official persecution of those who identified themselves with the name of Jesus Christ.  These verses remember a time when Jesus himself spoke of the fall of the temple, and of turmoil and trouble and suffering in the world.  They recall his words of warning about those who would prey on the fears and doubts that fill the air in such times, and put themselves forward as Messiahs, claiming the power to make God’s promises come true. 

And we hear a further warning to Jesus’ disciples, that they would be put forward, not as victors but as victims, as scapegoats and criminals.  Jesus tells them of the ironic twist of history by which their accusers will bring them before kings and governors, giving them their moment to testify.  It will be their part, in the confusion of a world that seems to be coming to an end, to speak the word of God; Jesus will put his own wisdom in their mouths, the words of judgment and promise that open the door to the new creation: “The kingdom of heaven has come near to you.”  “Love your enemies and bless those who curse you.”  “Those who are called great among you must be last of all and servant of all.”  “Have courage, for I have overcome the world.”    


I grew up with a rather dismissive opinion of President John F. Kennedy.  Once as a child I became fascinated with a book in the town library; a coffee-table book full of photographs, it was about his assassination and the days that followed, I went back to it again and again.  But somewhere along the line I picked up the idea that President Kennedy hadn’t really accomplished anything, and that if he hadn’t been young and handsome, and given a great speech at his inauguration, and died the way he did, he would be a minor figure in our history.  And I didn’t find any reason to fundamentally reconsider that opinion until very recently--just a few weeks ago, as a matter of fact. 

My wife was out of town for the weekend, which meant that on Friday night I got to watch what I wanted on TV, and maybe because of the upcoming 50th anniversary of his death, I selected a documentary on JFK.  In the course of the film they showed some footage of the speech that he gave to the General Assembly of the United Nations on September 20, 1963.  In that speech President Kennedy hailed the signing of the first major nuclear arms-control treaty, the ban on atmospheric testing which he’d proposed two years before.  And he took the moment to insist that this should be the first step toward ending the Cold War, not a brief pause in its continuation.  While acknowledging profound differences between the superpowers, he laid out a clear path toward comprehensive disarmament, and an intention to follow it, “building,” as he put it, “the institutions of peace as we dismantle the engines of war.”  He made bold proposals for cooperation among nations, including the Soviet Union, in science and technology and economic and social development, and recommitted his support to the United Nations as the cornerstone of global security under the aegis of international law. 

Near the conclusion of the speech, he said the following: “But peace does not rest in charters and covenants alone. It lies in the hearts and minds of all people. And if it is not there, then no act, no pact, no treaty, no organization can hope to preserve it without the support and the wholehearted commitment of all people. So let us not rest all our hopes on parchment and on paper; let us strive to build peace, a desire for peace, a willingness to work for peace, in the hearts and minds of all of our people. I believe that we can. I believe the problems of human destiny are not beyond the reach of human beings.”

The thing that was most stirring to me about these words was that I could see that he meant them.  The film shows President Kennedy leaving the podium after he had spoken, and making his way back to his seat.  And watching it I was transfixed by the way he lowered himself tenderly down into his chair, his body in evident pain, but even more I was moved by the expression on his face—humble, even a little shy, but luminous with wonder at the privilege of speaking such hope to a world in the grip of confusion and fear; it was the face of a man who has tasted peace in his own heart, and knows what the word really means.

We all know what happened next, and as we approach the 50th anniversary of that terrible day, the most important questions are not the unanswered ones about his death, but the ones about memory.  Is it just a memory of shock and grief, of where you were when you heard the news?   Is it memory of the man, of glamor and charisma and glaring personal failings?  Or is it a memory of the vision, of words spoken at great political and personal risk, with the resolve do something about them?  Is it a memory of something more than a murder, something more even than a man, something about God’s dream for the world? 

That dream did not die in 1963 in Dallas, or in 1965 in Harlem, or in 1968 in Memphis or Los Angeles.  It did not die on September 11, 2001, because violence cannot kill God’s dream of life and peace for the world.  It rises again and again from the graves of its fallen witnesses and speaks in new voices and new visions, because it is God’s promise to all people for all time.  It is the new creation for which all things in heaven and earth were made.  That is the message we come to this place, week by week, to remember, to say aloud, and whisper in our hearts.  That is the hope we cherish here in large ways and in small, for nations at war and children in the hospital, for families in need and a planet at risk, for the unknown and unborn, and for the beloved dead.  It is the promise that gives power and purpose to our lives, because it is the dream that makes the world come true.  



About Me

My photo
Petaluma, California, United States
I am a priest in the Episcopal Church, and have been (among other things) an organic farmer and gardener, and a Zen monk. I have a lifelong interest in social and spiritual renewal on the basis of contemplative discipline, creative nonviolence, and ecological practice. In recent years my work has focused intensely on the responsibility of pastoral ministry in the humanistic, evangelical, and catholic branch of Christianity known as Anglicanism. I'm married with a daughter, and have three brothers and two parents.