Showing posts with label peace. Show all posts
Showing posts with label peace. Show all posts

Saturday, June 17, 2017

Also God



·  Psalm 8


Thirty years ago this summer I was living in a kind of New-Age commune in the woods of Western Massachusetts and one beautiful afternoon a few of us were eating lunch outside at a picnic table when a great strategic bomber from the air base at Springfield went roaring nearly overhead.  Pacifist that I am, I muttered some kind of grumpy comment to my table companions and my friend Bruce smiled and said, “You know, that also is God.”  Which kind of stopped me in my tracks, because I did know that what he said was true.  I knew it was true, and at the same time, I knew that I didn’t believe it.  Because the huge warplane could also be God only in a whole and unbroken world.  Which is not the world of my experience.  
I live in a world of human artefacts and human enterprise that I experience as separate from and set against the world of natural things.  And I am not alone in this.  How often have I heard a person say that he or she experiences God most vividly in contemplating “nature,” in places where wild creatures still dwell!  How often have I done the same!  In such places we can see the beauty and mystery of an order of things that we did not create, and have not yet managed to pollute and destroy.  It is as if the wild places awaken in us faint memories of a forgotten language, one we used to speak and understand in a country we left behind long ago.  And when we come back from those places to the world we think we know, our world of machines and money and war, of business and government, of working and getting and spending, the language of wild things goes silent.
It slips again into oblivion, and with it goes a part of ourselves.  It is a part that we often scorn, as “romantic” and “naïve,” that we tell ourselves has no place in the “real” world, the practical, modern world of human affairs.  We say it belongs to the past, to childhood, to prehistory, or to “primitive” cultures that have been swept away by the tide of progress and civilization.  We tell ourselves this as a way of denying that we still have a choice.  We prefer to believe that the potential in human nature to be in sacred communion with the whole created order of the world has been lost beyond recovery.  Because this spares us the pain of knowing that every day we actively, systematically suppress it.  We prefer the despair of human isolation in a mute and mindless universe, to the guilt of admitting we have given up hope.
If this is so, it is in part because we have forgotten how to read the Bible.  We like to congratulate ourselves for figuring out that the first chapter of Genesis is not a scientifically-accurate chronology of cosmic evolution.  As if it ever intended to be that.  And yet we have closed our minds to its poetry, to its vision of a whole and unbroken world.   It is a vision of a world of which we human beings are an essential part, in which our unique power, our dominion over the fish and the birds, the wild and domestic animals, comes from being made in the image of the creator of it all.  Our activity, our filling and subduing the earth, eating the plants and their seeds, and the fruit of the trees, is not innately a crime or a curse against the creation.  It was meant as a blessing to the creature who, more than any other, is able to see this world as God does, as good in every particular thing, and all together very good.
Of course we know what’s coming next, in the Second Chapter: how the gift of power and freedom was more than we could handle responsibly; how it was not enough for us to know the goodness of the world, we had to know evil as well; how we found that evil in ourselves and so the world we know began to be, the world of shame, and mistrust of God, of blaming one other, the world of gender inequality, of jealousy and murder, of agriculture and mining and the building of cities, and of exiles wandering over the face of the earth.  But our historic obsession with that second story—and it is, after all, the story of us as we are—sometimes has made us forget our first creation story.  We have put it aside as if it is a story of who we were, in some irretrievable dream, with nothing to say about who we might be, or might become.
And yet the First Chapter of Genesis is precisely a story of hope.  It tells the essential spiritual truth of the world as a living unity, including human nature created in the image of God.  And more than that, this story places a gift in our hands.  It gives us a way to remember and renew the highest truth of who we are: that we are not simply masters of the earth community, but members of it, with a unique responsibility to love it for its own sake, and because it is the handiwork of God.  This story gives us the gift of time, time out from all our filling and subduing the earth, time to celebrate the glorious and gratuitous beauty and goodness of life in this world, to be again like God, as only we can be.
This gift is, of course, the Sabbath.  In Genesis 1, God does not create a world in which some places are holy and others are not.  But God does create a special holiness in time— every seventh day, hallowed as a day of rest.  In a practical sense, however, only one creature is able to number the days and consciously keep the Sabbath.   This is how we human beings are unique, as far as we know, among the creatures of the earth—not just that we are clever, resourceful, industrious, numerous, and strong—but that we mark time and set some apart for the rest that comes from God.  It is our privilege to enjoy this holy time of rest, on behalf of all the creatures in the world, to share God’s love for all that has been made, to share God’s judgment that the world is very good.
In the fullness of time one came who shared God’s love and gracious judgment perfectly.  He is Jesus Christ, Son of God and Son of Man, the Lord of the Sabbath.  The true human image and likeness of God was perfectly restored in him.  And his Lordship, his dominion, is for the sake of making the creation whole again.  It was his will, and the will of his Father, to share his true human nature, no longer broken off from God or from the world, no longer male nor female, Jew nor Gentile, slave nor free, with those who became his disciples.  This is the gift we hope for when we baptize a person in the name of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit, as we are doing for little Zane Ra today.  But it is not only we who have this hope: “The whole creation,” says St. Paul, in the 8th chapter of his letter to the Romans, “waits with eager longing for the revealing of the children of God.”
This is the great hope of the Bible, a hope that is always in danger of vanishing from the world—that human nature and the whole creation will be restored to harmony and share in the Sabbath peace and joy of God.  This great hope is inseparable from a great responsibility—for it lives or it dies in us.  But we do not shoulder this responsibility alone.  The Holy Spirit working in us, awakening hope for love and fulfillment, and this turns the struggle and suffering of everyday life into the path of discipleship, of growing into the full stature of Christ.  And it is the Son of God who walks beside us, God’s Word of wisdom and compassion, guiding our steps on the journey that leads to the fullness of life.  He promised to be with us every day until the ages of creation are crowned with completeness.  And because he is with us, we have nothing to fear, for though he is ever active, ever blessing, ever interceding on our behalf, he is also already at rest, already abiding in the eternal Sabbath day. 
  
  

Conflict Redeemed



As a pastor, one of the most critical parts of my job is to help people work through conflict.  Not that I’m always successful.  I am aware of relationships in our community where there is so much hurt and mistrust, and the conflicted parties are so deeply entrenched in their positions, that the most they can manage for each other is avoidance, and when needed, a chilly civility.   And there are questions that touch on our common life, where there are differences of opinion so pronounced, that we prefer not to talk about them.  We have to admit that it is a fact of life that, as the educator Parker Palmer once put it, “community is where you find the person you least want to live with,” and maybe the best we can hope for is to keep such conflicts from flaring into open hostility.  But the resurrection of Jesus offers a better hope than that. 
The story of Jesus is, after all, a story of conflict.  And at time of the Passover, the annual celebration of God’s decisive victory over the oppressors of the people, Jesus took the conflict to Jerusalem.  He brought his challenge to the chief priests, the elders, and the scribes, right into the heart of their stronghold—into the temple.  The gospels tell how as Jesus was teaching in the temple the ruling elite sent one representative after another to spar with him verbally, to try to back him down or trip him up--and how every time, their attacks blew back in their faces. 
Because Jesus turned each loaded question and devious insinuation into a subtle but devastating indictment of his opponents, of their cowardice, injustice and hypocrisy, their complicity with violence and idolatrous religion.  And with each of these encounters the crowd of on-lookers and their enthusiasm for Jesus and his teaching grew.  Until, fearing a total public relations disaster, no one dared ask him any more questions.
But the conflict didn’t end there.  Unable to take Jesus down publicly, the temple elite did what the powerful often do when they have lost their moral and political legitimacy.   They resorted to treachery and violence.   You know the story very well: how at supper Jesus told his disciples that one of them, his closest friends, would betray him to his death; how Judas Iscariot went out into the night, only to return later, leading the temple goons to the garden where Jesus used to go to pray; how he singled him out for them with a kiss.   You know how Jesus refused to fight, or to let his disciples fight for him, and how they scattered and fled as he was dragged away; how Peter followed, but when he was confronted, denied that he knew Jesus, not once, but three times.
You know this story so there’d really be no need to retell it if it were not for the fact that with the coming of Easter, that story so often disappears.  It is forgotten immediately, as if, in raising Jesus from the dead, God made the conflicts that led to his death irrelevant, or miraculously resolved them.   But such radical discontinuity between Holy Week and Easter is far from biblical.  Just look at Peter’s sermon in the Second Chapter of Acts.  It is a bold declaration that God has set Jesus of Nazareth free from the power of death, but it begins with an equally bold reminder to “you, my fellow Israelites,” that “you crucified this man, whom God attested to you with deeds of power, wonders, and signs, by the hands of those outside the law.” 
The Acts of the Apostles tells how the conflict that marked Jesus’ life and death doesn’t end with his rising from the dead, which itself only serves to prove that the conflict runs deeper, and its stakes are higher, than anyone previously thought.  In the resurrection, God’s Holy Spirit not only vindicates Jesus’ movement to renew Israel by a prophetic insurrection from below.  She also gives unprecedented power and universal scope to that movement, so that it breaks out across the world to challenge every “religion” that gives ideological cover to systems of exclusion and domination, and confronts the idols of the nations in the name of Israel’s God of creation, justice, healing and love.
But the Gospel of John tells us that before that can happen, the risen Christ has to reconcile his own community of disciples.  It is a traumatized community, not only because of the horrifying death of the teacher in whom they had placed such hope, but because the treachery of the ostensible leaders of their nation.  And one of their own inner circle aided and abetted that treachery, which they all passively acquiesced to out of fear.  That same fear still gripped them as they gathered for the evening meal on the first day of the week, and though one of them had not arrived, they locked the doors.  Who knows what premonitions of further betrayal haunted their minds as they thought of Thomas the Twin, out there somewhere as darkness fell on the city, doing who knows what, with who knows whom?
It is into the middle of this threatened little circle that the Lord came, bringing his peace.  He showed them the marks of betrayal on his body, and again said “Peace be with you.”  And they would need that peace when Thomas arrived.  We are used to thinking of Thomas as the one who doubted God, but it was not God whom Thomas doubted—it was his friends.  Maybe in the aftermath of seeing Jesus they were full of love and joy, and disbelief that they had ever doubted Thomas, but to him they seemed to be in the grip of a kind of group delusion.  Maybe he questioned why they would say that the Lord come to them when he was not there—what kind of game were they playing, and why didn’t it include him? 
My point is that we don’t know how Thomas’ doubt might have divided this already frail community, if the others had not received the Spirit of peace?  This peace is not simply an inner feeling.  It is an active power, the power to forgive.  The spiritual power of forgiveness, flowing from the crucified and risen Christ, is what breathed new life into the community of Jesus’ disciples, as it has ever since, again and again and again.  It is the power in which we are sent, as Jesus was sent, into inevitable conflict, to speak the word of God’s peace. 
It is also the power of discernment, because forgiveness can never be automatic.  It must be free, a decision given and received with eyes that see clearly the wounds that sin has made in the body of God.   But our standard of judgment must be Jesus himself: Jesus, who said “judge not, lest you be judged;” Jesus, who preferred agony on the cross to violence against those who misjudged him; Jesus, who sat down at supper with the one he knew would betray him and gave him bread and said, “this is my body, given for you.” 
Such forgiveness is hard to achieve, but simple to understand.  You just have to hold out your hand.  We are talking here about the difference between an open hand and a clenched fist.  The open hand is what Jesus presents to Thomas, when he shows himself at last, and Thomas understands that it is the hand of God.  This is a God who is not afraid of conflict, but lets us doubt, and disbelieve, and probe the painful places where the mere idea of God is not enough.  And if we don’t give up, but keep working through the conflict, a time comes when we find we are touching a living body. 
Our community is that body, a crucified body, risen out of conflict, bearing wounds.  And with that resurrection we were also given the Spirit of forgiveness, the power to make peace, to heal betrayal and come to trust each other again.  There is no more important work for us than to learn to use that gift.  Because it wasn’t given for our enjoyment, so we could congratulate ourselves on what a nice, warm, happy family we’ve become.  It was given to us as a mission; it is the Spirit in which we’ve been sent.      

About Me

My photo
Petaluma, California, United States
I am a priest in the Episcopal Church, and have been (among other things) an organic farmer and gardener, and a Zen monk. I have a lifelong interest in social and spiritual renewal on the basis of contemplative discipline, creative nonviolence, and ecological practice. In recent years my work has focused intensely on the responsibility of pastoral ministry in the humanistic, evangelical, and catholic branch of Christianity known as Anglicanism. I'm married with a daughter, and have three brothers and two parents.