Showing posts with label Isaiah. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Isaiah. Show all posts

Sunday, January 24, 2016

What a preacher needs



 
When I entered the seventh grade, I had, for the first time in my school career, a choice of electives.  I chose Drama, and the first role I ever had was that of the nefarious Squire Blackheart in a fairy-tale comedy called “The Thwarting of Baron Bolligrew.”  To my surprise, it turned out I was quite good, and after our performance, I found myself in the wondrous and terrifying position of being mobbed by gushing eighth-grade girls.  It was a degree of triumph I would never repeat, but thus began my flirtation with theatre that continued through high school and into college.  I say “flirtation” because I met some friends along the way for whom it was a full-fledged romance.  They were destined for a lifetime of waiting tables in New York City, and going to thousands of auditions, for the sake of the occasional minor role.  And I was never one of those.
I did dream of being an actor when I was younger, just as I dreamed of being a rock star, and a jungle explorer, and a quarterback.  But by the time I was an adolescent, when the question “what do you want to be when you grow up” starts to take on a little more gravity, it was clear to me that, while I enjoyed my time in the theater, it wasn’t my life’s work.   What I did not have the foggiest notion about, however, and would not for years and years, was that it was training for my true vocation.  I did not know it, and would have laughed in your face if you’d told me so at the time, but I can see now that it was part of my training to be a preacher. 
There are skills I learned doing school plays that I still use every week: simply being comfortable speaking or singing in front of a crowd, for instance, or projecting my voice to fill a room; how to vary the inflection of my voice for dramatic effect, or the use of comedic timing.  In preaching, as in acting, there is a text to interpret—in one case, the script of a play, in the other a passage or passages of scripture.  But what the actor and the preacher do with their texts are very different.  The task of the actor is to enter the text, so that the character she plays takes possession of her, and comes to life on the screen or on the stage.  This draws the audience into the world of the play, to know human emotion and human experience with a vividness we rarely match in our real, everyday lives.   
But a preacher’s job is not to draw her listeners into the biblical world, but to bring that world into ours.  So, in a way, the sermon that Jesus gives in Chapter 4 of Luke is the essence of Christian preaching.  Like any good preacher he begins with his text, in this case, Isaiah 61.  He also has a sense of drama.  When he finishes reading he sits down, and for a moment he says nothing, holding the attention of the room, letting the tension build in the silence until time itself seems to stop, waiting to hear what he will say.  When he does speak, he does not break that tension.  If anything he heightens that moment of suspense, so all the meaning of Isaiah’s text can enter it.  And what Jesus says is that these are not empty words.   They are full.  They are full of the power and truth of what is happening to you in this place, right here, right now. 
They are words about a mission, that is moving in the world by the proclamation of good news.  News is about what is happening now, and it is good when it is about what is breaking forth from this time, from these circumstances, that bears the fingerprints of God.  We can recognize those fingerprints because the purposes of God are consistent and unwavering.  God’s purpose to preach hope and victory to the poor, to announce release to the captives, recovery of sight to the blind, and liberation to the oppressed, was the same in Jesus’ day as it was in Isaiah’s and still is in ours.  And yet these are just words, just words in a book unless someone makes the proclamation. 
So when Jesus says “today this scripture is fulfilled,” he is talking about himself.  He is announcing that God has sent him, for the purpose that has always been there, for anyone to read in the law and the prophets.   His words are full of the Spirit’s creative power and so they give the grace that they declare.  Jesus’ preaching is not about good news, it gives good news, opens eyes, frees the captive and oppressed.  It inaugurates the year of the Lord’s favor, on an ordinary Sabbath morning in Nazareth of Galilee. 
But Jesus is also speaking about his audience.  This scripture has been fulfilled in your hearing, he says.  And this little added prepositional phrase, literally “in your ears”, is as central to Jesus’ preaching as the rest of it.  It poses questions to his hometown neighbors that they can only answer for themselves—did you hear me?  Do you believe that I fulfil the words the prophet said?  Or are you still holding those words at a distance, as if they belong to another time, another life, another world? 
These questions have not lost their significance, not least because the prophetic mission that Jesus claimed for his own has lost none of its urgency.  The news for the poor today is just about as bad as it ever was.  There are still countless captives waiting for release, and oppressed people dying to be free.  What may be less clear is how these ancient stories can speak to them, let alone to us.  And I guess that’s work that falls to me, as a preacher—to try to make that connection.  It’s no small task, under any circumstances, but to do it week after week after week is the hardest thing about my job.   I think it may also be the most important.  There is an element of craft involved, as with any other kind of work, and the longer one does it, the more confident and skillful in that craft one becomes.  But I must say, and forgive me if this sounds immodest, that I could not do it without the gifts of the Holy Spirit. 
 
The first of these gifts is a simmering discontent, a questioning and thirst for liberation that will not go away.  It’s a dissatisfaction so thorough that drugs cannot tranquilize it, and therapy will not heal it; meditation will not calm it, and political ideology won’t explain it away.  It is a questioning that will not be satisfied with any answer less complete than the answer given by God. 
The next gift I think you need to preach is the faith that this answer is in the Bible.  Not that you are picking out verses to memorize, but that the more you read it, and the more of it you read, the more you can begin to see what it is really trying to say.  So I try to read it every day, and to listen to what I read as closely as I can.  I try to keep the attitude that these words are not empty, but that Christ is speaking in them, if only I can hear, about his fullness. 
Another spiritual gift a preacher needs is the faith that her own experience somehow reflects what is written in the scriptures.  The connection is often quite tenuous.  Sometimes as I’m preparing to write my sermon, I find myself thinking about something that’s happened to me that seems completely unrelated to the texts I’m supposed to preach on that week.  But when I keep working—working with the text and working with my own experience—I find that the edges of each grow toward one another, and begin to interweave in ways I could never have foreseen. 
Finally, and most of all, a preacher needs the gift of people to preach to, people who will listen.  A preacher needs people who share his holy discontent, his longing for the good news of God.  He needs a congregation who read the Bible, and listen for the voice of Christ.  He needs a community where people are looking for how that voice is speaking in their own experience, who trust in, and act on, the authority of what it tells them.  He needs people with the faith and the courage speak with that voice in their own lives, who let it anoint them and send them with their own gifts of the Spirit, to proclaim good news to the world.      

Saturday, January 3, 2015

Son of David



2 Samuel 7:1-11, 16
 Canticle 15
Romans 16: 25-27
Luke 1: 26-38

Twenty years ago I made my first and only trip to Europe.  I spent about a month-and-a-half in Germany, but on the way there my girlfriend and I laid over for about five days in London.  We stayed with a friend of hers in a council flat in Camden Town and I walked for miles all over central London taking in the sights.  On one of these excursions I went along The Strand to Westminster to see the houses of Parliament and the Abbey church where the English monarchs have been married and buried and crowned since the Norman Conquest.
My parents had a coffee-table book about Westminster Abbey that I had loved as a child, so I it was one of the few tourist attractions in the city that I actually tried to go into, and not just admire from outside.  But when I entered the great West Doors of the church I found there was a large barrier across the nave, and you couldn’t go any further without paying an expensive admission fee.  So I remained near the entrance, with the other casual tourists, gazing over the barrier at what I could see of the high vaulted ceiling and the clerestory windows and the great rows of columns marching into the distance. 
And as I stood there contemplating, something stirred in my heart.  Maybe it was some kind of racial memory passed down to me from my English ancestors on my father’s father’s side.   Because I’m not one to go gaga for royal weddings or Diamond Jubilees, or to care one bit for what the Duchess of Cambridge was wearing on her recent visit to New York.  But in that church in that moment twenty years ago I understood the awe and reverence of my ancestors for their King.  Not as a celebrity, but as a symbol of the soul of the nation, of the land and the people, bound together in unity of blood, history and religion.  In England the sacred power of that symbol has a house, a shrine where it peculiarly dwells, and there I was, in that house. 
In the Second Book of Samuel, David decides that it is time to build a house like that.  He has defeated his enemies and consolidated his power in his new capital of Jerusalem.  So it is only natural that now he should want to build a temple for the God who chose him to be shepherd of Israel, who favored him, and granted him victory.   And at first David’s spiritual counselor, the prophet Nathan, sees nothing wrong with the proposal.  But that same night the word of the Lord comes to Nathan that it is not David’s place to do this.  Because this is still the God of the Exodus, a God of wandering and wilderness who is not ready to settle down to live in a house.
Here the Bible uses a play on words that works as well in English as it does in Hebrew—a “house” can be a building, a palace or a temple, a dwelling place for a king, or for a god.  But “house” can also mean dynasty, royal lineage, a great and noble family.  David wants to build for God the first kind of house, a house of cedar to take the place of the portable tent tabernacle where the Israelites have worshipped and made their sacrifices since the days of Moses.  But God’s promise to David is to make him a house of the second kind, a line of descendants who will rule his kingdom for ever.   
In the context of Biblical history, this promise carries a certain freight of irony, because David’s throne turned out to be a little shakier than that.  Due to the disobedience of his descendents, their infidelity and arrogance, injustice and pride, the power of the house of David peaked in the second generation, with David’s own son Solomon.  After that the history quickly becomes one of rebellions, civil wars, and divided kingdoms, one that drags on with only a few bright moments, until it comes to what seems like a final end with the last king of Judah marched away to Babylon in chains.
But in the Babylonian exile God’s promise to David became more important, not less.  In prophecies like the ones recorded in the book of Isaiah, it became a cherished symbol of the people’s survival and hope.  The prophets told them that their Lord had not abandoned them, but was still on the move with them, and that before long he would bring them back to the land of their ancestors, where Jerusalem would be restored, and the temple rebuilt.  There a descendant of the royal line of David, God’s anointed, the Messiah, would take his place upon the throne of a new and greater kingdom, a rule of perpetual peace, prosperity, and justice.  
The New Testament is not shy about taking these prophetic promises of the Messiah and applying them to Jesus.  So in the Gospel of Luke when God sends the angel Gabriel to the one chosen to be his mother, she is the fiancée of Joseph, a man of the house of David.  And after he has spoken to her of God’s great favor for her, the angel makes a promise about the child she will conceive: “the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there will be no end.” 
But this is not simply a national myth, about the restoration of a ruling dynasty.  Like that other story about Nathan and the building of the temple, the principal actor in this story is God.  As Mary immediately perceives, her child will not be born for the satisfaction of human ambitions and desires, no matter how natural or noble they might be.  His purpose will not be to furnish her husband with an heir, or the nation with the founder of a new royal line, but to establish a throne and a kingdom that belongs to God alone.
What kind of kingdom that will be becomes a little clearer in the subsequent scene.  Mary goes to visit her cousin Elizabeth, who does her honor as the mother of her Lord.  And this is when Mary, that lowly handmaid, unexpectedly bursts into triumphant song.  The words of the Magnificat, the Song of Mary, are not the words of prophecy about the messianic king.  Instead they hearken back to an even more ancient genre of biblical literature—those songs of women who give thanks to God, the liberator of the oppressed. 
At the shore of the Red Sea Miriam, the sister of Moses, leads the women of Israel with timbrels and dancing, singing: “Sing to the Lord, for he has triumphed gloriously; the horse and his rider he has thrown into the sea.”  In the book of Judges the prophetess Deborah sings a victory song to God after the peasantry of Israel defeats the Canaanites and their kings.   In the First Book of Samuel, God answers the prayer of Hannah, a childless woman, with the birth of a son.  He is Samuel, the prophet who will anoint first Saul, and then David, as Israel’s king. 
But before any of that, Hannah prays a poem that is the model for Mary’s song: “My heart exults in the Lord; my strength is exalted in the Lord…The bows of the mighty are broken, but the feeble gird on strength…The Lord raises up the poor from the dust; he lifts the needy from the ash heap, to make them sit with princes and inherit a seat of honor.”
If that sounds vaguely familiar, it is because Hannah’s son is consecrated to the service of the same God that Mary’s son will be.  This is a God who works through prophets and nations and kings, but his purposes are not identical with theirs.  The story that begins with the Gabriel’s greeting to Mary is about a God who also works through shepherds and fishermen, tax collectors and lepers and criminals.  This is a God who dwells in cathedrals, but also wanders through deserts, whose kingdom is found in palaces, but also turns up unexpectedly in shantytowns and hospitals, in prisons and fields of wheat, in kitchens, and tombs, and even in mangers.   On this fourth and final Sunday of Advent we look in heightened expectation for the birth of the Son of David, who will establish that kingdom, and rule it in peace for ever.


Sunday, December 7, 2014

Waiting for word




Kenneth Chamberlain, Sr. was a retired Marine Corps veteran whose Life Aid medical alert bracelet went off accidentally at about 5 o’clock in the morning on November 19, 2011.  Police officers responded to his home in White Plains, New York and he told them through the door of his apartment that he had not called them and did not need them, and he asked them to leave.  The Life Alert device in his home made an audio recording of what happened next—the officer’s curses, and shouts of “nigger”, the breaking-down of his door, followed by the use of a taser on a 68-year old man with a chronic heart condition.  The officers then shot him with a bean-bag round from a shotgun, before finishing him off with a revolver. 
A secret grand jury convened to review the case and on May 3, 2012 announced it would not bring criminal charges against the police officers involved in the shooting.  Two days later the office of the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York said it would review the case for possible violations of federal civil rights laws.  The family of Kenneth Chamberlain, Sr. is still waiting for word. 
Another family in Ferguson, Missouri now waits for word on the case of the man who shot young Michael Brown; just as they are waiting for word on Staten Island about the policeman captured on a cell phone video choking Eric Garner to death.  They waited for grand juries to conclude their secret proceedings, only to hear the word of no criminal indictment, and now must wait for word of possible federal civil rights cases.   People of color all over this country are waiting, waiting to hear the word that the life of a black man in America is not something cheap, that can been thrown away with impunity, but that word never seems to come. 
Words are being said, words like “Justice Department investigation,” and “officer re-training program” and “restoring trust in the police,” but those of us for whom the police represent protection and service do not know what it’s like to live in communities where there is no trust to restore.  We are not black and brown people in Ferguson, Missouri or one of the other neighborhoods all over this country where the police historically have been and all too often remain a presence of constant harassment and intimidation, and occasional murderous violence.  Those people do not take comfort from such words. 
The carefully calibrated statements of the state’s attorneys and federal officials are inadequate to their longing for justice.  The politicians’ vague promises of reform are not enough to sustain their hope.  But, though it might not be my place, I will say that neither will it be enough to punish individual police officers.  Some, no doubt, are filled with racist hate, but others are simply men in a dangerous occupation reacting as anyone would to their perception of a deadly threat.  Either way, they are products of systemic violence and institutionalized prejudice, oppression, and fear.  They also are victims.  
So putting a few more people behind bars, even white police officers, might give momentary satisfaction to the thirst for justice.  But it won’t be enough.  It won't be enough to end the folly of treating our nation’s social sickness with a militarized remedy.  This has already given us the second-highest per capita prison population in the world and turned Mexico, Colombia, and Central America into a killing field.  But it has not made us safe, or free—not even drug-free.
Sending Darren Wilson or Daniel Pantaleo to prison might signal that it is still a crime to kill an unarmed person even if that person is black.  And that would be something.  But it will do nothing about poverty and the lack of vocational and educational opportunities that forces people into the underground economy.  It will not rid our streets or our homes of the omnipresent cheap weapons that turn every routine traffic stop, and neighborhood party, and domestic quarrel into a potential firefight.  It will not end the school-to-prison pipeline that begins downgrading the academic expectations of black and brown males, and disproportionately singling them out for disciplinary punishment, in the lower grades  of elementary school. 
More long prison sentences will not heal the lingering wounds of the devastating trauma of slavery—of nearly four hundred years of systematic kidnapping, murder, rape, assault, torture, theft, and other mass crimes against humanity that were never indicted, and to this day are still hardly even acknowledged.  In the face of such sin and evil, and its ongoing denial, no indictment, or verdict, or punishment will be the word we long to hear. 

There are times when only the voice of God is enough.   There are situations where only God’s word can move the people who are hopelessly stuck, or comfort those who are utterly desolate. It’s times like these that call for voices that make a straight and level highway for the truth.  We need words of judgment and of comfort, words that will stand firm forever.  The families of Michael Brown and Eric Garner, of Trayvon Martin and Oscar Grant, Andy Lopez and Kenneth Chamberlain, Jr. need to hear that they have served their term, that their penalty is paid, that they have received from the LORD's hand double for all their sins, but now the glory of the LORD shall be revealed, and all people shall see it together.  Darren Wilson needs to hear this too, and George Zimmerman, and Daniel Pantaleo.  We all do.
The Gospel of Mark begins with someone who speaks those kinds of words, with a voice like thunder in the wilderness.  John tells the people to prepare a way, so God can come and set them free from their hopelessness and violence.  He does not call them out to the Jordan one by one, for individual acts of repentance.  The power of John’s voice inspires a mass movement.  They all go out to him together, rural people from the villages of Judea right alongside city dwellers from Jerusalem, a national movement of repentance and hope for forgiveness.  They all go out together to the Jordan, to the place where their ancestors crossed over from the wilderness and took possession of the land.      
John tells them that if they will stop denying what they have become, and admit the truth, they can become a new people. They have a chance to start again.  It is God who is giving them this chance, because God’s has come.  God is not delaying any longer, but is coming to them, and will do a new thing.  “Someone is coming,” says John, whose voice was able to get them all up bring them en masse to the banks of the Jordan, “someone more powerful than I.  I am not worthy to stoop down and untie his sandals.  I have baptized you with water; but he will baptize you with the Holy Spirit.”
Every year in this season of Advent we hear the voice of John, crying out in the wilderness, because this is the season of hope for the chance to start again.  This story offers us an extraordinary and powerful vision, the kind of word that can save a nation from itself.  It is a vision of our whole people going out together, going down to the waterside, going back to the shore where we first came into this land.  And whether we came here in the first class cabin or in steerage, or as cargo in the hold of a slave ship, we all strip down together.  We shed the entitlements of our color, be they entitlements of white privilege or of black grievance.  And standing there together, in our underwear, each of us confesses our part in the sins that have turned our nation into a place of hate, of violence, and fear.
We tell this story every Advent, and perhaps this year we tell it with a heightened sense of sorrow.  But in that sorrow there is hope, hope for the coming of God.  The story tells us to prepare the way, because the Lord will come.  If we can stop blaming and stereotyping one another and listen to each other speak the painful truth, God’s coming will not be wrathful judgment, but consolation.  God will make a new beginning.  He will forgive us, and more than that, his Holy Spirit will clothe us.  She will give us power to heal and restore. She will give us new visions, new voices, new words to speak.  She will make us a new people, no longer Black nor White, male nor female, slave nor free. 

  

About Me

My photo
Petaluma, California, United States
I am a priest in the Episcopal Church, and have been (among other things) an organic farmer and gardener, and a Zen monk. I have a lifelong interest in social and spiritual renewal on the basis of contemplative discipline, creative nonviolence, and ecological practice. In recent years my work has focused intensely on the responsibility of pastoral ministry in the humanistic, evangelical, and catholic branch of Christianity known as Anglicanism. I'm married with a daughter, and have three brothers and two parents.