Showing posts with label revelation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label revelation. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 24, 2016

Spiritual truths of Mothers' Day




There’s a calendar on the wall in the parish office that is illustrated with cartoons that make light of the vagaries of congregational life.   And the cartoon for this month has two panels side by side.  The first has a caption over it that says “Preaching on Mothers’ Day 2016…” and it shows a priest in his alb after the service, and a woman in a red coat with matching hat and a pearl necklace sticking a finger in his face and saying “How dare you fail to preach about Mothers’ Day!  How could you be so heartless!”  The caption on the second panel says “A year later…” and it shows a balding gentleman in a suit with a red bowtie and glasses shaking his finger in the priest’s face and saying “What were you thinking, preaching about Mothers’ Day?  Since when does Hallmark guide the lectionary?”
I’m feeling lucky because I see the opportunity today to talk about both Mothers’ Day and the lectionary.  Because, while Mother’s Day does have that aspect of being just another holiday for the advertising industry to sell flowers, and greeting cards, and chocolates, there’s also a deep religious meaning to the love and devotion we have for our mothers, and if this day gets us thinking about that a little bit, it’s a good thing.   Whether they are living or dead, whether the relationship we have with them is harmonious and loving, or not so much, to honor our mothers is to show respect for our most precious and irreplaceable gift, the one without which no other good can come to us—the gift of life.
The fact that our mothers bore us in their wombs, and gave birth to us in pain and travail, and nursed us and cared for us when we were too small and weak to care for ourselves, reminds us that we do not make ourselves on our own.  And this is true even when we no longer feel that we need our mothers.  No matter how strong and successful and accomplished we become, our lives continually depend on the generosity of other beings, and on the whole nurturing matrix of the universe.  This spiritual truth is recognized by cultures around the world who speak of the Earth, and even of God, as our mother.  And the fact that Mothers’ Day is also observed in countries all over the world might lead us to see that, though we have our billions of separate mothers, we are all children, and all have a mother, and in a sense all our mothers are one.
  
This week on the way to work one morning I was listening to the car radio and I heard part of an interview with a man named Guy McPherson, a professor emeritus from the University of Arizona.  The conversation was about climate change, and Dr. McPherson claimed to have a unique perspective on the problem because he studies it, not as a chemist or physicist or geologist or astronomer, but as a conservation biologist.  That is to say, he looks at it from the point of view of species and their habitat, what ensures their survival, and threatens it, and what causes them to go extinct.  And what Dr. McPherson states in a matter-of-fact way is that it is already too late for us.  The threshold has already been crossed, and the self-reinforcing feedback loops already set in motion, for a runaway climate-change scenario that is already taking human lives.  And it is picking up speed, like a snowball rolling downhill, so that a few years from now, the multiple impacts of rapidly rising global temperatures will cause the human race to be extinct.
As a student of the Bible and the teachings of Jesus I have to say that Guy McPherson may be correct, at least in this limited sense—it is too late for a way of thinking that believes that life must be torn, bleeding, from the body of the earth, that it must be clear cut and strip mined and drenched in poison, and taken under armed guard and hoarded in secret off-shore vaults.  It is too late for human cunning to engineer a way out of catastrophe, just as it has always been.   And it is too late for the belief that the disaster will fall only on others, people who don’t deserve any better, while wealth and privilege entitle some to continue undisturbed to pursue our happiness.  There is no gated community secure enough, or border wall high enough, to preserve some small minority in ease and comfort, while billions perish in misery.
But I also have to say that I believe it’s not too late for life to be received as a gift, in the knowledge that all life is one.  As Christians we are in a good position to be voices for hope, because these spiritual truths of Mothers’ Day are our truths.  The biblical tradition as a whole is very much concerned with the ultimate fate of the earth, and it doesn’t pull punches about the dire consequences for all life of human greed, hubris, and violence.   Yet for all that, it keeps coming back to the deep wisdom and benevolent purpose of God in creating the world in the first place, and giving us our unique place in it.  Jesus stands squarely in this tradition of warning and hope, and the good news about him speaks directly to it.  It tells us of his confrontation with the forces that corrupt human nature, and how by making peace he disarmed them.  In Christ God has shown the way of maternal love that leads to victory for the human race and through us for the whole creation.   
The Revelation to John is a vision of that ultimate victory, so it is strange that so many people, even some Christians, believe it is a vision of the destruction of the world.  Of course, the book does contain a lot of imagery of death on a horrifying scale.  That’s because it was written out of the experience of murderous persecution, and the seer of Revelation saw the violence inflicted by the Empire on the church as a symptom of a larger culture subservience to death, that was sowing a harvest of destruction.   But his vision doesn’t end with the destruction of the earth but with its renewal, with the city of God descending upon it like a bride adorned for her husband, and the tree of life, with its healing leaves and its many kinds of fruit, growing in the city beside the river of life that flows from the throne of God and the lamb and waters the world.  And the invitation goes out, “Come!”  And all who hear say “Come!” “And let everyone who is thirsty come.  Let anyone who wishes take the water of life as a gift.”
So to Guy McPherson our answer is that call, the call to come and drink the water of life that is given to all.  Even if it is too late for us to save ourselves, maybe there’s still time to heed that call.  It may be that Mother Earth has deep springs of resilience and regeneration that our best science doesn’t know about.   Maybe she has learned a thing or two in 4-and-a-half billion years than can help us now, if we turn our human powers from domination and violence to communion and cooperation with life.  And perhaps that wisdom is already in us, as an instinct more powerful than that of flight or fight—a deep capacity for maternal love, for tender care and self-sacrificing protectiveness in service to life not our own. 
This capacity was manifested for us in Jesus, who gave birth on the cross to a new humanity.  The Gospel of John tells how, on the night before he died, he commanded his disciples to love as he loved.  And on the same night he prayed for them, and for all who would come to believe in him through their word, asking the one he called Father to make them all one.  Jesus prayed that this unity will itself be a testimony to the whole world about the purpose for which he was sent, to bring to the earth the gifts he received from his Father.   It is our faith that he, who ascended and abides in the Father’s glory, still prays this prayer.  And this is our further cause for hope, in the face of climate change and nuclear arms and all the other threats of self-destructive human folly—that Christ still calls us to receive the gift of the Father’s glory, the glory that is synonymous with love.  From his divine human heart, broken with sorrowing compassion for us, the joy, health, and peace of victory over death stream continually to earth, watering the seeds of new creation.     

  

Belonging is hearing





Every Sunday after this service we have a reception over in the parish hall.  I make an effort to put in at least a brief appearance each week, although it is harder to do so after the early service, because the time between is short, and sometimes it is all I can do to get in a quick trip to the bathroom.  But I do enjoy going over and seeing what’s good to eat and how folks are doing.  And often I find one or more people waiting to talk to me.  The topics vary—sometimes it’s matter of church business someone didn’t get around to bringing up with me during the week.   Sometimes it is a personal matter, a subject of concern or a happy circumstance of life that someone wants to tell me about.  And then, every once in a while, a person will come up to me with a theological question.
This happened to me last Sunday, and I don’t know if this person had been looking ahead at the readings for this week—I suppose probably not.  But it was kind of uncanny, because what she asked me was “where do you hear the voice of Jesus?”  I was taken aback a little and had to think about it for a second, and then I gave a rather rambling answer in which I tried to describe various contexts which I have had the perception of what I thought might be the voice of Jesus, or at least the presence of his mind.  And I don’t know if she was satisfied with my answer—if she wasn’t, she was polite enough not to say so—but I do know that I wasn’t, and it wasn’t until this week, when I began to study the gospel passage we read today, that I understood why.
You see, I think my answer was actually kind of misleading, not because I don’t believe it’s possible to hear Jesus’ voice, or because I don’t believe I ever have, but because any expectations I might have raised about where his voice can be heard, or how we’ll know that it is his, are probably just going to get in the way of her hearing it.  When Jesus talks about hearing his voice, as he does in this morning’s reading from the Gospel of John, he’s not talking about the conditions under which we might have an experience of him.  He’s talking about what he has done to establish a relationship with us.  Hearing the voice of Jesus is a function of belonging to his sheep.
When the Jewish leaders in Jerusalem come up to Jesus in the temple they speak to him as if he owes them an explanation.  They want to know why, if he is God’s Messiah, he won’t come right out and tell them so.  But the reason they are so bent out of shape about this is that he fails to satisfy their expectations.  They have a high sense of their own place in God’s scheme of things, and if Jesus is really here to carry out the purposes of God, then surely he will get to work on their agenda.  And this is how we all are, more or less, at least part of the time.  We’re not sure about Jesus because he doesn’t seem to be doing what we think he ought to do—he’s not making us happier, or holier, or more successful.  He’s not improving the people we want him to improve.  He’s not fixing what seems to be broken in the world, or the things that are broken in us.   So it would be nice if he would say something, to reassure us, to let us know that he is here, that is paying attention, and does care, and will get around at some point to making things better for us.
But Jesus says, “I did speak to you.  I did show you who I am as plain as day, but you did not believe.”  And the point here is not that there is some kind of “believing in Jesus” that might convince him that we are worthy of being counted among his sheep, or that we deserve to hear his voice, and if we keep on trying we will eventually get it right. “You do not believe,” says Jesus, “because you do not belong to my sheep.”  In other words, believing in Jesus is something that comes about because we belong to his sheep, not the other way around.  Until we take that initial step of trusting that he has taken us under his guidance and care, anything we believe about him will probably be no more than our own mistaken notion.  We won’t see his works, and we won’t hear his voice.
Believing in Jesus grows out of accepting his love for and acceptance of us.  But how can you have that kind of trusting relationship with someone whose voice you haven’t heard, who you don’t really know how to believe in?  Well, it’s a very important question, and the answer isn’t the one we probably want to hear.  Simply put, we have to borrow it from someone else.  We have to take someone else’s word for it.  That’s what the author of John means when he writes, near the end of the Gospel, that this book is “written so that you may believe.”  And that’s why Jesus doesn’t talk about being my sheep, but about belonging to my sheep.  Because sheep belong to a flock.
This is humbling, even humiliating for us modern people, who prize our individual autonomy and personal authority above all.  And it must be said that belonging to Jesus’ flock does involve risk.  There is the ever-present danger that those who have leadership in the flock, who claim to hear the voice of Jesus, are self-deceived, or worse, self-serving.  There is the risk that the flock could see their belonging as a title to preferential treatment or a guarantee of purity, and proceed exclude, expel, and even persecute those they decide don’t qualify.  There’s the possibility that belonging to the flock will become blurred with other exclusionary forms of belonging, with racism or sexism, nationalism or party politics, and become just another tool of hatred, injustice, and violence.
Christians have shown themselves capable of creating communities of belonging like this.  But so are every other kind of people, which leads me to believe that this is an endemic problem not of being Christian but of being human.  And for all the human ailments that afflict the church, there is still at its heart, in its constitution, you might say, an invitation to a different mode of belonging.  It is put forward for us in the Revelation to John as a vision of the church as it will be, an image of a great throng from every family, and language, and tribe, and nation, worshipping together before the throne of God.  It is a community guided and protected by the lamb at the center of the throne, the slaughtered lamb who is their shepherd, whom they trust and follow because he isn’t swayed by anyone’s narrow and self-interested agenda, but has entrusted himself completely to God. 
The testimony of the first followers of Jesus is that he identified himself so completely with the work of God that he could say “I and the Father are one.”  By which he means that his personal mission is one with the creative activity of the Father.  His act of laying down of his life for the sheep is one with God’s act of loving the world so much that he gave his only Son, that the world might be saved through him.   This is more than simply a statement about the divinity of Jesus, and why he was worthy to be raised from the dead.  It’s an invitation to a new way of being human, founded not on the exclusion of a vilified other—be it a sexual other, a religious or ethnic or political other, or any other kind—but founded on the Father’s loving embrace of all whom he has made.   
This way of belonging comes into our lives in the witness of other followers of Jesus to the fullness of life that flows from his gift to the world of himself.  It is a gift he gave without discrimination, to hopeless sinners and self-righteous enemies and faithless disciples alike.  To accept this gift is to be known by him and to follow him, as one who belongs to his sheep.  This is how we come to believe, and to hear his voice, how we learn at last to love as he loves.  It’s how we belong, not just to a church, or to a religion, but to the life of God, that cannot be taken from us, and will never pass away.

Monday, August 10, 2015

The Good Ol' Testament







 
I’ve been taking some heat recently, as I do from time to time, for the Sunday Bible readings.  Not the poetic and inspiring spiritual readings from the Letter to the Ephesians, but the Old Testament readings.  Some of you are puzzled as to why we have to listen to stories in church about people behaving badly, about adultery and treachery and murder.  You wonder about readings which seem to put forward an archaic picture of an angry and vengeful God.  You ask what positive spiritual benefit there could be in retelling such stories, and whether we couldn’t choose more uplifting ones, or possibly just leave off the regular reading of a lesson from the Old Testament altogether.  So I’ve decided today to explain, if I can, a little about why the Hebrew Bible is the way it is, and why I think it’s worth reading.
First, I want to say that it’s okay with me that you are raising these questions.  It means you are engaged, and paying attention, and care about what the church says it believes, which is as it should be.  I also want to say that I accept full responsibility for the fact that we are reading these particular texts in our Sunday worship.  Because while I’m pretty sure our bishop would not permit us to stop reading the Hebrew Bible entirely, I do have some leeway in deciding which texts we choose to use.  The Episcopal Church plans its reading of scripture on the basis of something called the Revised Common Lectionary, which is a schedule that we share with millions of other Christians in many denominations around the world.  And every year, during the long Season after Pentecost (roughly June through November), the Lectionary gives us a choice of two different “tracks” for the Old Testament reading. 
One of these tracks follows the practice that prevails throughout the rest of the church year, of cherry-picking readings from the Hebrew Bible that mirror themes of the Gospel lesson of the day.  This makes for a coherent “package” of readings that feels quite satisfactory.  But it also reinforces a bias that has colored the Christian reading of the Bible since the dawn of the Gentile church.  This is the view that the Old Testament has no other purpose, and no other meaning, than to give a kind of advance notice of Christ.   We are free to take a bit from this place and from that one, as it suits the telling of our own story, because those scriptures are no more than preamble to our own, with no narrative structure or compositional integrity of their own that we are bound to respect. 
In doing this we take our lead from passages like today’s Gospel reading from John, which makes a sharp distinction between Jewish memory, and the new thing that is Jesus Christ.  It is “the Jews” who grumble that Jesus cannot have come down like something new-made from heaven, because he is the son of Joseph.  They know his father and mother, and can trace his ancestry like that of any other Jew.  Jesus replies that what he means is that he is sent to carry out God’s purpose.  He has come to gather those who have heard and learned from God.  He will nourish them with the imperishable food of God’s will, and this guidance already draws them right through history with the life of the world to come.   
But if you think about it, what Jesus is describing here is a deeply Jewish project.  Its foundation is a history of distinctively Jewish hopes.  The anti-Jewish polemic of the New Testament, with its emphasis on differentiation, has made it hard for us to see an essential continuity.  Because as diverse and incongruous a collection of writings as the Hebrew Bible is, it has an underlying unity, which is embodied not in the text, but in the life and hope of a people in their God.  Jesus was one of those people.  His genius was a new experience of unity with the God of Jewish revelation, life with whom he embodied to the ultimate degree. For Christians the life, and death, and resurrection of Jesus is the decisive event that reinterprets all that came before it.  But we have to see that it is the culmination of a story that Jesus knew to be the story of himself.  So if we want to really understand Jesus as a living person, we need to learn to read the book that taught him who he is.   That is why, every year, I choose the other lectionary track for the Sunday readings during the season after Pentecost.  That is the one that traces the rough outline of the whole Hebrew Bible, beginning with Genesis and ending three years later with the last book of the Hebrew Bible, the book of the prophet Malachi.    
These readings sometimes fit awkwardly, at best, with the Gospel lesson on any given Sunday, but they do relate powerfully to each other.  Consider the readings about David of the last few weeks.  We heard about David’s moment of glory, when he ascended to the throne of his united kingdom, which spoke of a transcendent hope in God’s promise to his people of sovereignty and peace.  But the Hebrew scribes also knew they had to tell the whole truth about David, and so we had the story of Bathsheba, showing David’s lack of integrity and abuse of power.  This led to personal and national tragedy, as a sign of God’s judgment. 
The mystery of God’s way with his people includes glory and judgment, promise and warning.  And somewhere in between these extremes is compassion, as in today’s reading when we simply bear witness to the grief-stricken cries of a father for his son.   Because whatever else David’s  story is about, it is about a man, and the raw emotional truth of human experience.
The Bible is not God’s word about us, and it is not our word about God, and it is not our word about ourselves, but it is all three of these things woven inextricably together.  Which is exactly what is unique about it.  It contains almost no mythology: no descriptions of heavenly realms, or tales of the origins and adventures of the gods.  It is also quite thin in metaphysics and philosophy.  What it is about is the unity of the God who made us, and the world in which we live, and who sustains the life of all.  It attempts to tell the whole history of human interaction with that God.   And because it is a human story it is full of the brave and noble, the shameful and ignorant, the inexplicable things that humans do.    
But woven throughout, and tying it all together, is this recurring theme of the revelation of God.  God keeps breaking in to interrupt the human story, and the message of these revelations is not just “I exist—worship me!”  It is, “I care what happens to you, and I have a purpose for you.  I am involved in your story.  I do what I do for my own reasons, but they have everything to do with your flourishing, with your living the way human beings are really meant to live.  So trust me—and here’s what I want you to do.”
This repeated discovery of God’s involvement with them is why this inconsequential little tribe of Israelites, left behind a far more detailed record of their history than the great empires on their borders.  That is why they clung tenaciously to that memory through one conquest after another, through all the persecutions and deportations, and efforts at forced assimilation—because their history as a people was also the history of God’s word to humankind.  And it is more than a story of the past—it is also God’s blueprint, sketchy though it might be, of a truly human future.
That refusal to let go of memory makes the Bible sort of like your crazy Great-Aunt Millie’s attic.  The out-of-fashion and horribly uncomfortable ladies underwear is jumbled together with the Picasso she found at a garage sale.  There is a lot in it that is peculiar, incomprehensible, even downright repugnant.  But it’s funny how we moderns, in our arrogance, assume that the compilers of the book didn’t know that.  They were surely dubious about many of the same things we are, but they did not share our confidence in the infallibility of our own hindsight.  “If we have learned anything our ancestors didn’t know,” they seem to say, “that knowledge was hard-won and is easily lost.  So we want to remember how we learned it, by telling the whole story.”  They didn’t claim that all of it was equally true, or equally important, only that all of it was worth remembering. 

About Me

My photo
Petaluma, California, United States
I am a priest in the Episcopal Church, and have been (among other things) an organic farmer and gardener, and a Zen monk. I have a lifelong interest in social and spiritual renewal on the basis of contemplative discipline, creative nonviolence, and ecological practice. In recent years my work has focused intensely on the responsibility of pastoral ministry in the humanistic, evangelical, and catholic branch of Christianity known as Anglicanism. I'm married with a daughter, and have three brothers and two parents.